ArticlePloS one2026
The politics of processed foods: Consumer perceptions of policies targeting ultra-processed foods.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examined U.S. public support for six potential government policies designed to regulate ultra-processed foods (UPFs). Specifically, we consider support for two information-based policies (defining UPFs and providing dietary recommendations around UPFs); three restriction-based policies (UPF restrictions in grocery stores, schools, and food assistance programs); and one price-based policy (taxing UPFs). Survey results from 990 U.S. consumers showed the highest support for information-based policies, with the least support for UPF taxation. Additionally, there was considerable heterogeneity in policy support based on perceptions of UPFs, subjective knowledge, and demographics. These results may help policymakers gauge public sentiment around and appetite for regulating UPFs in the U.S.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.