Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42224101›Full record

ArticleRevista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P2026

Restraining hospitalized children for procedures: practices of nursing professionals in Brazil.

Ronaldo Antonio Silva, Maria Aparecida Munhoz Gaíva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ronaldo Antonio SilvaUniversidade do Estado de Mato Grosso, Diamantino, MT, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1962-3182
Maria Aparecida Munhoz GaívaUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, MT, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8666-9738

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo describe the restraint practices used by Brazilian nursing professionals when performing healthcare procedures on hospitalized children.

methodA cross-sectional study was conducted with 897 professionals working in the care of hospitalized children in the country. Data were collected between May 2024 and January 2025, using a questionnaire with sociodemographic information and another about restraint practices, which underwent content validation and pre-testing. The bank was analyzed in software R.

resultsRestraint was characterized as a common method; however, professionals reported that they did not receive training during their education and/or professional practice to perform it. The most commonly used techniques were physical, with support, and psychological, in procedures such as venipuncture, medication administration, and catheterization. The decision to use it was related to the child's behavior, ensuring their safety, and their refusal to cooperate.

conclusionThe restraint practices used by Brazilian nursing staff for pediatric care were described based on techniques, reasons, consent, family participation, control of potential harm, and documentation in medical records.

Indexed as

Child, HospitalizedNursing Staff, HospitalPediatric NursingPractice Patterns, Nurses'Restraint, PhysicalAdultBrazilChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42224101
PMCPMC13225314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.