Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42224015›Full record

ArticleJMIR AI2026

Estimating a Physiological Lung Function Score and Biological Sex Using Pulmonary Function Tests and Machine Learning: Retrospective Study.

Patrick W Johnson, Zachary S Quicksall, Jieun Lee, Augustine S Lee, Kaiser G Lim, Victor E Ortega, Shivaram Poigai Arunachalam, Scott A Helgeson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR AI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patrick W JohnsonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, United States, 1 9049536728.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-1375
Zachary S QuicksallDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, United States, 1 9049536728.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-0925
Jieun LeeDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, United States, 1 9049536728.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2376-4356
Augustine S LeeDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, United States, 1 9049536728.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8018-5145
Kaiser G LimDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Rochester, MN, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-6559
Victor E OrtegaDepartment of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6361-7372
Shivaram Poigai ArunachalamDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, United States, 1 9049536728.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3251-5415
Scott A HelgesonDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic Hospital, 4500 San Pablo Road S, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, United States, 1 9049536728.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7590-2293

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sex and age have long been known to affect lung function. Several biological variables and anatomical factors may contribute to sex- and age-related differences in pulmonary metrics. Objective: We hypothesized that a machine learning model could be trained to predict a person's lung age and self-reported sex using pulmonary function test data. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed complete pulmonary function tests from 6392 healthy adults across 3 Mayo Clinic regions. Four models of increasing complexity were trained using gradient-boosted machines to predict chronological age and biological sex. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley additive explanation values and partial dependence plots. Quantile regression was used to estimate reference percentiles for predicted lung age. Results: The best-performing age model (model 4, inclusive of time-series features) achieved a root mean square error of 7.01 years (95% CI 6.73-7.30) and a mean absolute error of 5.55 years (95% CI 5.32-5.80). The best-performing sex classification model (model 4) achieved an area under the curve of 0.981 (95% CI 0.975-0.988), sensitivity of 91.7% (95% CI 89.0%-93.9%), and specificity of 95.6% (95% CI 93.9%-97%). Key predictors for lung age included residual volume as a percentage of total lung capacity (TLC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second, and alveolar volume. For sex classification, peak expiratory flow, height, and age were among the most influential features. Age-stratified evaluation showed the overestimation of lung age in younger adults and underestimation in older adults. Predicted lung age increased broadly with chronological age, and quantile regression provided normative reference ranges. Conclusions: Applying artificial intelligence to pulmonary function data allows the prediction of a patient's sex and estimation of lung age. The ability of an artificial intelligence algorithm to determine physiological lung age, with further validation, may serve as a measure of overall respiratory health.

Indexed as

ageartificial intelligencegendermachine learningpulmonary function testspirometry

Identifiers

PMID42224015
PMCPMC13224920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.