Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223938›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Lymph Node Dissection and Postoperative Complications After Lung Cancer Resection.

Isheeta Madeka, Khaled Noueihed, Jacob Woodroof, Shale Mack, Hamza Rshaidat, Gregory L Whitehorn, Sneha Alaparthi, Scott H Koeneman, Tyler R Grenda, Nathaniel R Evans and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Isheeta MadekaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Khaled NoueihedDepartment of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Jacob WoodroofDepartment of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Shale MackDepartment of Surgery, University of Chicago Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
Hamza RshaidatDepartment of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Gregory L WhitehornDepartment of Surgery, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore.
Sneha AlaparthiDepartment of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Scott H KoenemanDivision of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Tyler R GrendaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Nathaniel R EvansDepartment of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Olugbenga T OkusanyaDepartment of Surgery, Division of Esophageal and Thoracic Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Current lung cancer guidelines recommend lymph node sampling (LNS) with the 3 + 1 rule, which recommends station-based sampling with at least 3 N2 (mediastinal) and 1 N1 (hilar) nodal stations. Although there is oncologic benefit to rigorous LNS, potential negative impacts on surgical outcomes have not been well investigated. As adoption of the 3 + 1 rule increases given its formalization as guideline-concordant care, associations with adverse outcomes are crucial to characterize. Objective: To evaluate whether satisfying the 3 + 1 rule is associated with increased postoperative complications. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Database, which was queried for patients with clinical stage T1 to T3, N0, M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent surgical resection with known LNS between July 1, 2021, and January 1, 2023. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2024 to March 2025. Exposure: A propensity match was conducted to compare the postoperative complication rate by 3 + 1 LNS status. Main Outcomes and Measures: Data on demographic characteristics were collected and analyzed. Primary outcomes included postoperative complications, such as arrhythmias, pleural effusion requiring drainage, blood transfusion, prolonged air leak, therapeutic bronchoscopy, pneumonia, respiratory failure, bronchopleural fistula, pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, prolonged ventilatory support, myocardial infarction, and sepsis. Thirty-day mortality and readmission rates were also evaluated. Results: The cohort included 28 439 patients (median [IQR] age, 69 [66-75] years; 4791 [59.5%] female). There were 18 939 patients (66.6%) who satisfied the 3 + 1 rule. In the unadjusted group, the 3 + 1 cohort had longer median (IQR) operating room duration (224 [178-281] vs 210 [161-273] minutes, P < .001) and rates of pathologic upstaging (2520 [13.3%] vs 922 [9.7%], P < .001). In the postmatch analysis, there were no other significant differences in postoperative complication rates, and the aforementioned associations in the 3 + 1 group were no longer observed. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with NSCLC, the 3 + 1 rule was not associated with increased postoperative complications. This study's findings suggest support for the continued use of this strategy in terms of overall safety profile.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionPostoperative ComplicationsAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42223938
PMCPMC13227313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.