Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223936›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Multicenter Validation of Clinical Sepsis Phenotypes.

Chang Ho Yoon, Daniel Sjöholm, Kristin E Wickstrøm, Anders Skyrud Danielsen, Christian Prebensen, John Karlsson Valik, Aleksander Rygh Holten, Erik Koldberg Amundsen, A Sarah Walker, David W Eyre and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Chang Ho YoonNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Daniel SjöholmDepartment of Medicine Solna, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden.
Kristin E WickstrømDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Blood Cell Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Anders Skyrud DanielsenDepartment of Infection Control and Preparedness, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Christian PrebensenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
John Karlsson ValikDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.
Aleksander Rygh HoltenInstitute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Erik Koldberg AmundsenDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Blood Cell Research Group, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
A Sarah WalkerNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
David W EyreBig Data Institute, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Valeria VitelliOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Pontus NauclérDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Four clinical phenotypes of sepsis based on data from electronic health records have been proposed. Although promising, the generalizability of these phenotypes remains uncertain, and multisite validation is needed. Objective: To validate, using the same methods and inclusion criteria, the 4 clinical phenotypes derived from Sepsis Endotyping in Emergency Care (SENECA) data. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multisite retrospective cohort study uses data on adult patients admitted to the emergency departments in Stockholm, Sweden (January 1, 2011, to September 1, 2023); Oxford, England (February 4, 2014, to June 20, 2021); and Oslo, Norway (January 4, 2019, to October 9, 2023) university hospitals. Included encounters are those with body fluid cultures taken, documented antibiotic administration, and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores of 2 or more, all within 6 hours of admission. Data analysis was conducted from November 2, 2023, to September 1, 2025. Main Outcomes and Measures: Consensus clustering with k-means was used to derive 4 clinical phenotypes at each site, comparing them with the SENECA-derived phenotypes, as well as with one another. Results: There were 30 865 patient encounters in Stockholm (mean [SD] age, 68 [16] years; 18 165 men [59%]), 15 575 in Oxford (mean [SD] age, 71 [18] years; 9067 men [58%]), and 1806 in Oslo (mean [SD] age, 71 [17] years; 1068 men [59%]). There was little consistency between the SENECA clinical phenotypes and each site's own phenotypes, with a Cohen κ of 0.32 for Stockholm, 0.37 for Oslo, and 0.40 for Oxford; the Adjusted Rand Indices were 0.21 for Stockholm, 0.27 for Oslo, and 0.26 for Oxford. There was also little consistency between the phenotypes derived in Stockholm, Oxford, and Oslo. Conclusions and Relevance: This study suggests that the 4 clinical phenotypes of the SENECA data are not generalizable across 3 independent cohorts. This calls for further exploration of possible underlying sepsis subgroups using alternative approaches that mitigate the inherent stochasticity in many unsupervised and semisupervised clustering methods.

Indexed as

PhenotypeSepsisAgedAged, 80 and overElectronic Health RecordsEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNorwayOrgan Dysfunction ScoresRetrospective StudiesSweden

Identifiers

PMID42223936
PMCPMC13227316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.