Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223873›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Interpretable MRI Radiomics for Preoperative Meningioma Consistency Prediction.

Ilies Djebbara, Ancuta Ioana Friismose, Bo Halle, Mads Hjortdal Grønhøj, Ivar Yannick Christensen, Andreas Viet Hy Bui, Erik Øxenberg Paulsen, Frantz Rom Poulsen, Jan Saip Aunan-Diop

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ilies DjebbaraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. Ildje21@student.sdu.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-1013-5178
Ancuta Ioana FriismoseDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Bo HalleDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Mads Hjortdal GrønhøjDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Ivar Yannick ChristensenDepartment of Radiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Andreas Viet Hy BuiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Erik Øxenberg PaulsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Frantz Rom PoulsenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Jan Saip Aunan-DiopDepartment of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomic models for meningioma consistency prediction typically optimise discrimination while remaining opaque: They rarely clarify which features drive predictions, where discriminative patterns arise, or what they correspond to on MRI, limiting clinical interpretability and hindering clinical adoption. We developed an interpretable radiomic framework from preoperative T1-Gd MRI in 42 resected meningiomas (soft n = 16, intermediate n = 13, firm n = 13). Tumours were segmented using a semi-automated workflow, validated against independent neuroradiologist segmentations in 19 cases (Dice 0.84 ± 0.12). From 1409 radiomic features, ICC-stable features (ICC ≥ 0.75) were retained and redundancy removed (|r|> 0.95). Patient-level cross-validation with LASSO-based feature selection and CatBoost was applied. Interpretability was addressed through three components: stable-feature identification (WHICH), SHAP attribution, and voxel-wise local radiomic mapping using an 11 × 11 × 11 sliding window (WHERE), supplemented by a radiomics-to-radiology feature dictionary (WHAT). Three features formed a compact signature: Textural Entropy (wavelet-LLH_glrlm_RunEntropy), Calcification Index (exponential_gldm_LargeDependenceHighGrayLevelEmphasis), and Local Homogeneity (wavelet-LHH_glcm_InverseVariance). CatBoost achieved macro-averaged one-vs-rest AUC 0.87 and accuracy 66.7%; errors were mainly between adjacent classes (fold-averaged off-by-one accuracy 90.3%; aggregate 38/42, 90.5%). Local maps showed spatially heterogeneous texture and focal high-grey-level dependence hotspots in firm tumours, although group-level Calcification Index differences did not survive Bonferroni correction. We present a proof-of-concept interpretable radiomic framework that integrates established explainability techniques-LASSO-based feature stability analysis, SHAP attribution, voxel-wise spatial mapping, and a radiomics-to-radiology dictionary-to link stable radiomic signatures to spatial tumour patterns and recognisable MRI characteristics, offering a potentially extensible approach for other imaging tasks where tissue composition influences clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Magnetic resonance imagingMeningiomaModel interpretabilityRadiomicsTumour consistency

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.