Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223838›Full record

ReviewInfection2026

The evolution of sepsis care: from protocol-driven management to personalized intensive care.

Tim Rahmel, Benedikt H Siegler, Markus A Weigand, Patrick Meybohm, Sascha David, Frank Brunkhorst, Mathias Pletz, Michael Adamzik

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tim RahmelDeutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany. Tim.Rahmel@ruhr-uni-bochum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7039-6288
Benedikt H SieglerDeutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Markus A WeigandDeutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Patrick MeybohmDeutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Sascha DavidDeutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Frank BrunkhorstDeutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Mathias PletzDeutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.
Michael AdamzikDeutsche Sepsis-Gesellschaft, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSepsis remains one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite evolving supportive therapeutic strategies, outcomes, particularly in severe disease manifestations, remain unsatisfactory. In recent years, the conceptual understanding of sepsis has undergone a fundamental shift: from a uniform disease entity to a heterogeneous syndrome characterized by variable pathophysiology and diverse clinical trajectories. In parallel, key aspects of diagnosis and management have been re-evaluated in the context of recently updated guidelines as well as international consensus statements.

methodsThis review integrates recent guideline updates and emerging concepts in sepsis management into a clinically oriented synthesis. Particular focus is placed on evolving approaches to infection control, hemodynamic stabilization, tissue perfusion-oriented resuscitation, individualized antimicrobial strategies, and the concept of refractory septic shock.

resultsIn the early phase, sepsis management continues to rely predominantly on standardized interventions focused on rapid infection control and hemodynamic stabilization. As the disease progresses, however, therapeutic strategies increasingly require continuous reassessment and adaptation to the individual patient context. Recent guideline developments therefore reflect a broader shift from rigid protocol-driven algorithms toward more flexible, context-sensitive, and physiology-guided approaches. A central component of this evolution is the growing emphasis on tissue perfusion-oriented resuscitation, individualized hemodynamic management, and risk-adapted antimicrobial strategies. Another important recent development is the proposed definition of refractory septic shock, which aims to identify a subgroup of patients with persistent hemodynamic instability and tissue hypoperfusion despite guideline-based initial therapy. Beyond its prognostic relevance, this concept may provide a pragmatic framework for structured therapeutic escalation and phenotype-guided treatment strategies.

conclusionOverall, contemporary sepsis care is evolving toward a staged management model in which standardized early interventions are increasingly complemented by individualized and dynamically adapted therapeutic decisions during later disease stages. Building on these developments, this review integrates recent guideline updates and emerging concepts into a clinically oriented synthesis and discusses their implications for personalized and phenotype-guided sepsis care.

Indexed as

Clinical Practice GuidelinesPersonalized Intensive Care MedicinePrecision MedicineRefractory Septic ShockSepsis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.