ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Interpretable machine learning model for predicting operative difficulty in robotic total mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Precise preoperative prediction of surgical complexity in robot-assisted total mesorectal excision (R-TME) is essential for optimizing surgical strategies. The current study aimed to construct an interpretable machine learning (ML) model to anticipate operative difficulty in sphincter-preserving R-TME. Retrospective data from 449 patients diagnosed with mid-to-low rectal cancer undergoing R-TME at Center A were analyzed. The dataset was partitioned randomly into training (n = 314) and internal validation (n = 135) groups using a 7:3 ratio. Additionally, external validation was conducted with a prospective cohort (n = 100) from multiple centers. Operative difficulty was quantified using a scoring system ranging from 0 to 13. Feature selection was performed employing Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, followed by evaluation of five ML algorithms. Model accuracy and robustness were measured using metrics including the Area Under the Curve (AUC), calibration plots, decision curve analysis (DCA), and supplementary indicators. Interpretability of the predictive model was enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Critical predictive factors comprised BMI, neoadjuvant treatment status, clinical staging, tumor distance to the anal verge, interspinous diameter, lateral mesorectal width, posterior mesorectal thickness, and two specific pelvic angle measurements. Among evaluated ML methods, Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) demonstrated superior performance, achieving an AUC of 0.874 in the training cohort and 0.835 in internal validation. Calibration plots and DCA indicated excellent robustness and significant clinical applicability of the GBM model. Furthermore, external validation presented an AUC of 0.809, confirming the model's generalizability. SHAP-based analysis delineated individual predictor impacts, facilitating the creation of an accessible online prediction instrument. This study successfully established and externally validated a transparent ML-based model to predict operative challenges in sphincter-preserving R-TME. This model can effectively aid surgeons in identifying anticipated difficulties prior to surgery, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making and improving surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42223752What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.