Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223740›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

Validation of Hindi and English ironic sentences for bilingual comprehension research.

Utkarsh Shukla, Niharika Singh

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Utkarsh ShuklaCentre of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (CBCS), University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India. utkarsh00shukla00@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-2965-7406
Niharika SinghCentre of Behavioural and Cognitive Sciences (CBCS), University of Allahabad, Prayagraj, India.

Funding

Funds for Improvement of Science and Technology Infrastructure, Department of Science and Technology (DST) DST-FIST: SR/FST/LS-I/2017/51
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irony is a complex communicative device that contrasts the explicit, literal meaning with the implicit intent and is sensitive to cultural and linguistic context. Despite growing interest in bilingual irony comprehension, experimentally validated materials for non-Western bilinguals remain scarce. This study addresses this methodological gap by adapting and validating a bilingual set of ironic and literal stimuli in Hindi and English, suitable for investigating psycholinguistic processing in Hindi-English bilingual adults. Drawing on established English-language irony sets, the stimuli were structurally adapted and culturally localised, then translated and back-translated by native speakers. A rigorous validation procedure involving 60 Hindi-English bilinguals assessed familiarity, comprehension, clarity, ironic intent, and translation quality for each text using a five-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses revealed high familiarity, clarity, and comprehensibility across both languages, with ironic stimuli consistently rated as highly perceived for irony and literal stimuli rated as low. The final materials comprise 50 irony-literal sentence pairs and 10 fillers, offering a tightly controlled stimulus set for future controlled cross-linguistic investigation. This research provides a methodological foundation for investigating figurative language processing in bilinguals and advances understanding of pragmatic competence across diverse sociolinguistic contexts.

Indexed as

ComprehensionLanguageMultilingualismPsycholinguisticsAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBilingualismFigurative languageHindi-EnglishIronyPsycholinguistics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.