ArticleEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2026
CT-based quantitative assessment of talar neck geometry: development of a standardized protocol and reliability analysis.
Article in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo define reproducible computed tomography (CT)-based parameters for quantifying talar neck geometry and to evaluate their inter- and intra-observer reliability. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty-five CT studies of adult feet without talar pathology were randomly selected from a prospectively maintained database. Multiplanar reconstructions were standardized along the talar axes to define reference planes. Five morphometric parameters were measured: declination angle, inclination angle, torsion angle, and medial and lateral talar neck lengths. Two fellowship-trained orthopedic surgeons and one musculoskeletal radiologist independently performed all measurements twice, four weeks apart, using DICOM viewer software. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were calculated using two-way random effects intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
resultsAll parameters were identifiable and measurable on the standardized CT planes across all studies. Inter-observer reliability was excellent for inclination angle (ICC 0.92, 95% CI 0.87-0.96) and good for declination angle (ICC 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.89); torsion angle showed poor reliability (ICC 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.61). Medial and lateral neck lengths demonstrated good reliability (ICC 0.77-0.83). Intra-observer reliability across observers was good to excellent (ICC > 0.80 for all parameters except torsion).
conclusionWe have established a standardized CT-based protocol for assessing talar neck geometry with good-to-excellent reliability for most parameters. The proposed framework enables consistent quantification of talar neck alignment and could be potentially useful for facilitating evaluation of fracture reduction and correction planning in talar malunions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42223709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.