Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223698›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

Lexical Inference in L2 Chinese: Does Contextual Information Always Work?

Wenwen Zhu, Meng Cheng, Bing Feng, Tianxu Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wenwen ZhuCollege of Applied Chinese, Beijing Language and Culture University, 15 Xueyuan Ave, Haidian district, Beijing, 100083, China.
Meng ChengCollege of International Chinese Studies, Beijing Language and Culture University, No. 15 Xueyuan Ave, Haidian district, Beijing, 100083, China.
Bing FengCollege of International Education, Minzu University of China, 27 Zhongguancun South Ave, Haidian district, Beijing, 100081, China.
Tianxu ChenCollege of International Education, Minzu University of China, 27 Zhongguancun South Ave, Haidian district, Beijing, 100081, China. tianxuc@muc.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3683-0837

Funding

National Social Science Foundation of China No. 22BYY162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability of second language (L2) learners to guess the meanings of unfamiliar words, which is known as lexical inference, is crucial for learning words and for reading comprehension. However, the extent to which L2 learners can make effective use of the contextual resources surrounding unfamiliar words remains uncertain, as many L2 studies seem to suggest a low success rate for lexical inferencing in context; furthermore, whether the relationship between contextual richness and the success of lexical inferencing is influenced by L2 learners' linguistic knowledge (i.e., vocabulary and grammatical knowledge) is undetermined. Sixty-six L2 Chinese learners who were attending Chinese universities participated voluntarily in this study. All the participants completed four computerized tasks: a short-term memory task, a vocabulary knowledge task, a grammatical knowledge task, and a lexical inferencing task with three contextual conditions. The results revealed that: 1) regardless of their linguistic knowledge, L2 learners performed better in lexical inference when provided with a more informative context compared to a less informative or a non-informative context, indicating that the degree of contextual richness plays a significant role in L2 learners' success; 2) L2 learners with greater linguistic knowledge performed marginally better when inferring the meanings of unknown words in the more informative context than did those with less linguistic knowledge; and. 3) although L2 learners' linguistic knowledge did not generally have a moderating effect on their lexical inference via the use of contextual information, there appeared to be some complexity in this relationship for participants with greater linguistic knowledge.

Indexed as

ComprehensionLanguageLearningMultilingualismPsycholinguisticsVocabularyAdultChinaFemaleHumansMaleMemory, Short-TermReadingYoung AdultContextual richnessL2 ChineseLexical inferenceLinguistic knowledge

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.