ReviewResults and problems in cell differentiation2026
Models of Cellular Mechanosensation.
Review in Results and problems in cell differentiation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the past decade, theoretical and experimental work in mechanobiology has become increasingly interdependent, with modeling now serving as an essential tool for interpreting experiments and guiding measurements. Cellular mechanosensation, the conversion of mechanical cues into biochemical signals, governs essential processes such as migration, polarization, lineage specification, and tissue homeostasis, and its dysregulation contributes to disease. Quantitative models of mechanosensation have been central to clarifying how cells detect and respond to force across multiple scales, from ion channels and molecular bonds to adhesions, cytoskeletal dynamics, nuclear deformation, and transcriptional regulators such as YAP/TAZ (Yes-associated protein and transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif). In this chapter, we survey both experimental and theoretical advances in mechanosensation, emphasizing how mathematical and computational models complement experiments, expose limitations, and generate testable hypotheses and conceptual frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42223636What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.