Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223620›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026

Comparison of functional and anatomical parameters in patients with nasal obstruction: peak nasal inspiratory flow and computed tomography-based internal nasal valve angle.

Melih Alpay, Fuat Bulut, Betul Agirgol, Hande Ozgen, Ahmet Emre Kaymaz, Hakkı Caner Inan

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Melih AlpayDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye. melih_alpay@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-9328-7080
Fuat BulutDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-7987
Betul AgirgolDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6059-1703
Hande OzgenDepartment of Occupational Health Clinic, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2877-226X
Ahmet Emre KaymazDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4801-9463
Hakkı Caner InanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Health Sciences, Bursa Training and Research Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6254-372X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe internal nasal valve (INV) is the narrowest segment of the nasal airway and plays a key role in nasal airflow resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), bilateral INV angles measured on computed tomography (CT), and nasal examination findings in patients presenting with nasal obstruction.

methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study included 94 patients who presented with nasal obstruction to the otorhinolaryngology outpatient clinic between January 2024 and September 2025. All patients underwent detailed nasal examination and septal deviation was classified according to the Baumann classification. Bilateral INV angles were measured on coronal paranasal sinus CT images. PNIF values were obtained from medical records. Statistical analyses were performed to assess correlations and group differences.

resultsThe mean PNIF value was 68.1 ± 24.7 L/min, and the mean bilateral INV angle was 11.2 ± 3.2°. A moderate, significant positive correlation was observed between PNIF values and bilateral INV angles (rho = 0.290, p = 0.005). Patients with a bilateral INV angle below 9° had significantly lower PNIF values compared with those with angles ≥ 9° (p = 0.011). No significant differences in PNIF values or INV angles were found among different Baumann septal deviation subtypes.

conclusionNarrower INV angles are associated with reduced functional nasal airflow as measured by PNIF. Assessment of the INV provides additional functional insight beyond septal deviation classification alone. PNIF represents a practical, noninvasive tool for functional evaluation of nasal obstruction and may support clinical decision-making and surgical planning.

Indexed as

Nasal CavityNasal ObstructionTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedAirway ResistanceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal SeptumRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAirway resistanceNasal obstructionNoseTomographyX-ray computed

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.