Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223588›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026

Correction: Differentiating uterine adenosarcoma from endometrial polyps: MRI imaging features.

Kumi Harada, Yasuhisa Kurata, Yuki Himoto, Aki Kido, Mitsuhiro Kirita, Atsushi Yoshida, Yuka Kuriyama Matsumoto, Junzo Hamanishi, Sachiko Minamiguchi, Hiroaki Ito and 11 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Kumi HaradaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yasuhisa KurataDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan. y.kurata.36.0@gmail.com.
Yuki HimotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Aki KidoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Mitsuhiro KiritaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Atsushi YoshidaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuka Kuriyama MatsumotoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Junzo HamanishiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Sachiko MinamiguchiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Hiroaki ItoDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Akitoshi NakashimaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Takashi MinamisakaDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Toyama University Hospital, Toyama, Japan.
Sayaka DaidoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Kaoru AbikoDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Koki MoriyoshiDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan.
Kumiko AndoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Shigeki ArizonoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Takuya AokiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Shigeo HaraDepartment of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Masaki MandaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Kyoto University Hospital, Kyoto, Japan.
Yuji NakamotoDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID42223588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.