Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42223550›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Rhythmic Training on Executive Function and Phonological Skills in Preschoolers.

L Boulc'h, D Pereira, S Jhean-Larose

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

L Boulc'hEDA Laboratory, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France. laetitia.boulc-h@u-paris.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-4006
D PereiraEDA Laboratory, University of Paris Cité, Paris, France.
S Jhean-LaroseERCAE Laboratory, University of Orleans, Orléans, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phonological skills and executive functions are fundamental cognitive abilities underlying reading acquisition. It is therefore crucial that children begin developing these capacities early, starting in preschool. This study tests the hypothesis that psychomotor training focused on temporal processing enhances early predictors of reading ability. The first part of the study investigates the relationships between rhythmic ability, inhibitory control, and key pre-reading skills in preschool children aged 4 to 6 years. The second part examines the effects of rhythmic training on emergent literacy skills. A distinctive feature of this research is its longitudinal design. Children's cognitive and motor abilities were first assessed at age 3, during their initial year of formal schooling. Half of the cohort participated in a rhythmic training program administered over two 12-week sessions. Post-intervention assessments were conducted at regular intervals up to age 6, evaluating phonological awareness, executive functioning, and emergent reading abilities. The findings underscore the significant role of rhythmic training in supporting reading development. Results indicate that such training may positively influence early literacy skills and enhance specific executive functions, including inhibitory control. In conclusion, the incorporation of musical and motor activities into early childhood education may offer a promising approach for fostering cognitive processes essential for reading.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentExecutive FunctionInhibition, PsychologicalMusicPhoneticsReadingChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleInhibitionPhonological awarenessReadingRhythm

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.