ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2026
Examining selection dynamics and limitations in multi-round protein selection of high diversity libraries.
Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Proteins and peptides underpin essential biological functions and technological applications, from targeting disease-relevant interactions to providing broad enzymatic activities. However, engineering molecules with desired properties remains difficult, owing to complex sequence-structure-function relationships and the lack of data on specific systems. Experimental selection strategies, including directed evolution, phage display, and mRNA display, address this challenge by leveraging high diversity libraries and iterative enrichment under defined selection pressures. This allows for the identification of candidates without requiring extensive prior knowledge, and can generate extensive datasets for use in machine learning. While many selection systems exist, comparisons across different selection approaches are hindered by the lack of a unifying analytical framework. Here, we developed a toolset of broadly applicable analyses for assessing selection dynamics in multi-round or multi-condition experiments, ranging from position level analysis of sequence properties to full sequence space mappings through protein language model embeddings. Performing analyses across different systems, we identify desirable traits in selection experiments including enrichment of distinct sequence patterns and correlation between enrichment and final desired functions. Notably, even under weak selection regimes with all sequences <1% frequency, functional sequences (e.g., 70nM IC50 binder to SARS-CoV-2 main protease) are still consistently enriched. We also find repeated selections of the same starting library can help differentiate selection effects of varying conditions (e.g., different delivery of metal ligand) from system noise. These findings, along with the toolset, can be used to guide experimental design, interpretation, and troubleshooting across protein and peptide discovery platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.