Trial reportJournal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR2026
Augmentative and Alternative Communication Generative Language Intervention: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeChildren with a wide range of impairments such as cerebral palsy and childhood apraxia of speech can benefit from augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). When AAC is provided, it frequently focuses on improving basic pragmatic skills such as requesting or on early semantic skills such as vocabulary acquisition. To address this issue, the primary goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of implementing the AAC Generative Language Intervention (AAC-GLI) program on the aided expressive grammar of preschoolers with relatively intact receptive language skills who could benefit from AAC.
methodA randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate the results. A total of 40 children who required AAC participated in the control group, intervention group, or both groups. The families of both the control and intervention group participants received a half-day AAC workshop. The intervention group also received 28 play-based AAC-GLI sessions. Weighted mean length of utterance in symbols (W-MLUSym), which was developed specifically for aided communicators, was used to measure progress.
resultsThe intervention group demonstrated superior effects on W-MLUSym compared with the control group. Additionally, growth modeling demonstrated that the intervention condition was a significant moderator of change over time, with children in the intervention condition having statistically significantly greater increases in W-MLUSym, while W-MLUSym for children in the control condition remained similar to baseline. DISCUSSION: AAC-GLI can be used to teach preschoolers with a range of impairments to improve their expressive grammar skills. Providing AAC intervention that focuses on grammatical growth is an important part of expressive language development for these young children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.