ArticleJournal of vision2026
Monkey upload: Improving robustness using multi-stage neural alignment.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent research has shown that aligning neural network representations with neural recordings has the effect of regularizing them (Federer, Xu, Fyshe, & Zylberberg, 2020; Li et al., 2019; Pirlot, Gerum, Efird, Zylberberg, & Fyshe, 2022), improving their performance across several metrics. However, previous work in this field has predominantly used neural data from the V1 cortex, and comparable performance gains are obtained when the V1 data are replaced by a noise distribution with similar statistics (Federer et al., 2020; Pirlot et al., 2022). In this research, we present the results of aligning the hidden layers of a convolutional neural network model with macaque brain recordings from V1, V4, and IT. Previous research, using only data from the inferior temporal cortex (Dapello et al., 2022), resulted in improved robustness to adversarial examples. Here we show that aligning all three areas improves the model's robustness against several different kinds of corruption. Furthermore, we show that the standard alignment approach, deep canonical correlation analysis (DCCA) is not necessary to achieve good results. We found that when using the VICReg unsupervised loss function for alignment, the model displays more reliable robustness against a subset of corruptions than DCCA. When aligning all three areas, VICreg is superior to InfoNCE (Oord, Li, & Vinyals, 2019) and DCCA, which show robustness to 4, 2, and 0 distortions, respectively. Finally, we show that DCCA is very sensitive to randomizing the data, VICReg is mildly affected, and InfoNCE is not sensitive at all. Hence, for two of the models, it is not just the distribution of the data that matters when aligning all three areas. Overall, our research provides further support for the impact of neural data in developing more robust and neurobiologically plausible models of vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.