ArticleNeural plasticity2026
Consistent Brain Entropy Changes During Rumination Across Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners.
Article in Neural plasticity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Consistent Brain Entropy Changes During Rumination Across Three Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scanners.Neural plasticity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rumination, characterized by repetitive and self-referential thinking, is closely linked to depression and a broad range of psychiatric disorders. However, previous research has predominantly relied on task activation or network-level approaches, leaving critical gaps in our understanding of local brain activity dynamics during ruminative states. To address this, we employed brain entropy (BEN), a novel functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)-based neuroimaging measure, to quantify the temporal irregularity and complexity of local brain activity during rumination. We analyzed a publicly available dataset comprising 41 healthy adults who completed identical fMRI tasks across three MRI scanners. Each scanning session included four conditions: resting state, sad memory, rumination, and distraction. Voxel-wise BEN analyses were conducted to examine condition-related differences, with brain regions showing consistent patterns across all three scanners at p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Our findings revealed distinct neural signatures associated with different cognitive states. Compared to sad memory, rumination was associated with decreased BEN in the visual cortex (VC), whereas distraction was associated with decreased BEN in the posterior cingulate cortex/precuneus (PCC/PCu). Furthermore, rumination exhibited significantly increased BEN in the PCC/PCu relative to distraction. These results suggest that rumination is characterized by heightened temporal irregularity in regions supporting internal self-referential processing, accompanied by reduced engagement with external environmental information. The present study demonstrates the utility of BEN in elucidating the neural mechanisms of rumination, providing novel insights into how cognitive states are reflected in local brain activity patterns. These findings carry implications for both theoretical frameworks of ruminative cognition and the development of neuroimaging biomarkers for clinical applications in depression and related disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.