Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222856›Full record

ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026

Effect of Processing Technology on the Degradation Behavior of Poly(p-dioxanone) Cog Threads.

Duo Li, Qiufeng Wang, Kun Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Duo Li
Qiufeng Wang
Kun Zhang

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Poly(p-dioxanone) (PPDO) cog threads are widely used in facial rejuvenation. Common barb-fabricating techniques for PPDO threads include injection molding, compression molding, and cutting. These methods subject PPDO to distinct thermal and mechanical histories, potentially altering its internal structure. However, how these structural differences affect degradation and clinical longevity remains unclear and requires systematic investigation. Objectives: To investigate the influence mechanisms of 3 processing techniques on the Methods: Poly(p-dioxanone) cog threads prepared by 3 techniques were degraded in 37°C PBS for 32 weeks. The mass loss rate, inherent viscosity, tensile strength, grasping force, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were measured periodically. Results: All samples exhibited a 2-stage degradation profile. In the first 8 weeks, mass loss was slow, inherent viscosity decreased rapidly, and tensile strength declined uniformly. After 8 weeks, mass loss accelerated, inherent viscosity reduction slowed, and tensile strength was largely lost. Injection-molded threads (highest processing temperature) degraded the fastest; unheated cut threads retained better molecular chain integrity for prolonged degradation; compression-molded threads had an intermediate degradation rate. For mechanical properties, cut threads had the slowest initial tensile strength loss due to no thermal damage (all 3 converged in later stages); injection-molded threads exhibited faster grasping force retention decline than compression-molded ones, confirming intensive thermal history accelerates degradation. Conclusions: The processing technology significantly influences the degradation rate of PPDO cog threads. Rational selection of processing methods can tailor degradation behavior, providing theoretical support for choosing the optimal cog threads in clinical applications. Level of Evidence 5 Therapeutic: For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Identifiers

PMID42222856
PMCPMC13221950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.