ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2026
Effect of Processing Technology on the Degradation Behavior of Poly(p-dioxanone) Cog Threads.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Poly(p-dioxanone) (PPDO) cog threads are widely used in facial rejuvenation. Common barb-fabricating techniques for PPDO threads include injection molding, compression molding, and cutting. These methods subject PPDO to distinct thermal and mechanical histories, potentially altering its internal structure. However, how these structural differences affect degradation and clinical longevity remains unclear and requires systematic investigation. Objectives: To investigate the influence mechanisms of 3 processing techniques on the Methods: Poly(p-dioxanone) cog threads prepared by 3 techniques were degraded in 37°C PBS for 32 weeks. The mass loss rate, inherent viscosity, tensile strength, grasping force, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were measured periodically. Results: All samples exhibited a 2-stage degradation profile. In the first 8 weeks, mass loss was slow, inherent viscosity decreased rapidly, and tensile strength declined uniformly. After 8 weeks, mass loss accelerated, inherent viscosity reduction slowed, and tensile strength was largely lost. Injection-molded threads (highest processing temperature) degraded the fastest; unheated cut threads retained better molecular chain integrity for prolonged degradation; compression-molded threads had an intermediate degradation rate. For mechanical properties, cut threads had the slowest initial tensile strength loss due to no thermal damage (all 3 converged in later stages); injection-molded threads exhibited faster grasping force retention decline than compression-molded ones, confirming intensive thermal history accelerates degradation. Conclusions: The processing technology significantly influences the degradation rate of PPDO cog threads. Rational selection of processing methods can tailor degradation behavior, providing theoretical support for choosing the optimal cog threads in clinical applications. Level of Evidence 5 Therapeutic: For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.