ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Recent advances in defending the privacy attacks of large language models for healthcare applications: a concise review.
Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted across healthcare applications, including clinical decision support and medical documentation systems. However, their deployment in medical settings raises significant privacy and security concerns due to the sensitivity of protected health information and stringent regulatory requirements. Recent studies have shown that LLM-based medical applications can cause medical data leakage through related API usages. This raises ethical concerns and threatens HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) compliance, blocking the trustworthy deployment of LLMs in the medical domain. This review examines emerging privacy attacks and the related defense approaches in LLMs with a special focus on healthcare applications. We organize the attack and defense approaches based on Secure AI Framework (SAIF), systematically covering vulnerabilities across the data, model, application and infrastructure layers. We performed detailed analysis on major classes of privacy attacks and further examined state-of-the-art defense mechanisms under realistic healthcare application scenarios. A key finding of this review is the persistent privacy-utility tradeoff: stronger privacy protection often leads to substantial degradation in clinical performance, which may render models unsuitable for mission-critical medical tasks. The healthcare related deployment of LLMs needs to be evaluated against clinical utility thresholds rather than generic language modeling metrics. We identify open challenges in evaluation, system-level deployment and regulatory verification, and outline research directions that balance clinical utility with regulatory compliance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.