Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222848›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Federated learning with dynamic weighted aggregation for multi-crop disease detection: a hybrid CNN-transformer approach.

Ragoor Shashank, R M Bhavadharini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ragoor ShashankSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.
R M BhavadhariniSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Chennai, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crop diseases pose a significant threat to agriculture globally, causing a loss of 220 billion dollars annually. The problem can be solved through traditional machine learning methods which run on central servers but face two main obstacles: farmers refuse to provide their farming information and the uneven distribution of crop diseases across different regions. This paper introduces a federated learning framework that addresses these challenges through a novel approach that combines hybrid CNN-Transformer architectures with dynamic weighted aggregation. Our system applies EfficientNet-B0 and MobileNetV2 lightweight models which use MobileViT blocks together with CBAM and ESA attention mechanisms to extract detailed features from crop images. The innovation lies in the dynamic aggregation strategy, "AdaClass"-Adaptive Class-Aware aggregation, that identifies the underperforming classes in each round using class-wise F1 score and emphasizes the clients that are having a stronger performance on challenging disease classes.This approach helps in promoting a balanced performance across different disease classes. This particularly benefits the disease classes that are difficult to detect. Extensive experiments on two standard datasets demonstrate strong results: the proposed EfficientNet-B0 hybrid model achieves 99.32% accuracy on PlantVillage and 92.5% on CCMT datasets, while the MobileNetV2 achieves 99.17% and 91.4% respectively. Importantly, these models remain efficient enough for deployment on edge devices, with the MobileNetV2 hybrid requiring only 7.63 MB storage and processing images in 41.2 milliseconds.

Indexed as

agricultureCNN-transformercrop disease detectiondynamic aggregationfederated learningmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42222848
PMCPMC13219276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.