ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
DeepTrackSecure: an integrated classification-detection system with predictive risk analytics for proactive railway safety management.
Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Railway track failures such as cracks, displacements, corrosion, and missing fasteners pose serious safety risks and require timely detection and prioritization. Manual inspection techniques are time-consuming, prone to mistakes, and unsuitable for extensive monitoring. This paper suggests DeepTrackSecure, a multi-stage deep learning framework for railway track fault detection and severity-aware risk prediction, to overcome these constraints. The suggested system uses YOLOv5 for accurate fault region localization in defective images after using ResNet50 as an initial screening model to categorize railway track images as defective or non-defective. By combining defect area, detection confidence, and defect frequency, a quantitative severity score is created that goes beyond traditional detection and allows for well-informed risk assessment. Random Forest and XGBoost models are assessed for classifying track conditions into low, medium, and high-risk levels based on this severity representation, exhibiting dependable and consistent decision-making. Ablation experiments to compare YOLO-only detection, classification-detection fusion, and the full severity-based risk prediction model confirm the role of each of the system components. Also, runtime and memory analysis are used to ensure that the performance is near to what is required in edge and cloud deployment and that the robustness is tested in harsh conditions like blur, noise, and low-light conditions. The findings of the experiments indicate that DeepTrackSecure functions as a decision-support and maintenance prioritization tool that produces severity-derived risk proxies (Low/Medium/High) validated against expert opinion. The system is intended to assist maintenance scheduling decisions rather than serve as a directly deployable operational safety system; broader deployment should be preceded by recall improvement and validation against real failure-event ground truth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.