Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222845›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Systematic review of trends in deep learning for UAV cybersecurity.

Usman Tariq, Tariq Ahamed Ahanger, Irfan Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Usman TariqPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Tariq Ahamed AhangerPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.
Irfan AhmedDepartment of Computer Science, College of Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) operate in navigation, sensing, and communication environments that are frequently degraded or adversarial. Their attack surface spans flight-control and payload software, radio links, and swarm coordination. This PRISMA-aligned systematic review synthesizes peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025 and organizes the evidence using an OSI-inspired threat taxonomy that maps spoofing, jamming, intrusion, and malware to system touchpoints and observable anomalies. We compare deep learning architectures, training targets, feature representations, evaluation practice, and deployment constraints relevant to single UAVs and swarms. Across the literature, convolutional and recurrent models dominate intrusion and anomaly detection pipelines, while attention-based, graph, and generative models appear in newer work targeting multi-agent settings and limited labels. Evidence most often relies on protocol traffic and onboard telemetry, whereas RF inputs are used less frequently and are typically represented as raw samples or spectrograms when datasets allow. Studies increasingly report efficiency-oriented deployment using pruning, quantization, distillation, or split inference to meet onboard compute and energy limits. Federated and multi-agent approaches are evaluated for scalability and robustness under poisoned updates, and blockchain-integrated designs are discussed under bandwidth and power constraints. Key gaps persist in shared datasets, repeatable adversarial stress testing, uncertainty and explainability reporting, privacy preservation, and certification-ready assurance cases for aviation regulation.

Indexed as

adversarial robustnessdeep learningexplainable AI (XAI)intrusion detection systemsUAV cybersecurity

Identifiers

PMID42222845
PMCPMC13219357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.