SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Systematic review of trends in deep learning for UAV cybersecurity.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) operate in navigation, sensing, and communication environments that are frequently degraded or adversarial. Their attack surface spans flight-control and payload software, radio links, and swarm coordination. This PRISMA-aligned systematic review synthesizes peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and 2025 and organizes the evidence using an OSI-inspired threat taxonomy that maps spoofing, jamming, intrusion, and malware to system touchpoints and observable anomalies. We compare deep learning architectures, training targets, feature representations, evaluation practice, and deployment constraints relevant to single UAVs and swarms. Across the literature, convolutional and recurrent models dominate intrusion and anomaly detection pipelines, while attention-based, graph, and generative models appear in newer work targeting multi-agent settings and limited labels. Evidence most often relies on protocol traffic and onboard telemetry, whereas RF inputs are used less frequently and are typically represented as raw samples or spectrograms when datasets allow. Studies increasingly report efficiency-oriented deployment using pruning, quantization, distillation, or split inference to meet onboard compute and energy limits. Federated and multi-agent approaches are evaluated for scalability and robustness under poisoned updates, and blockchain-integrated designs are discussed under bandwidth and power constraints. Key gaps persist in shared datasets, repeatable adversarial stress testing, uncertainty and explainability reporting, privacy preservation, and certification-ready assurance cases for aviation regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.