Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222844›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

In-context adaptation of VLMs for few-shot cell detection in optical microscopy.

Shreyan Ganguly, Angona Biswas, Jaydeep Rade, Md Hasibul Hasan Hasib, Nabila Masud, Nitish Singla, Abhipsa Dash, Ushashi Bhattacharjee, Soumik Sarkar, Aditya Balu and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Shreyan GangulyIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Angona BiswasIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Jaydeep RadeIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Md Hasibul Hasan HasibIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Nabila MasudIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Nitish SinglaIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Abhipsa DashIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Ushashi BhattacharjeeIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Soumik SarkarIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Aditya BaluIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Anwesha SarkarIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.
Adarsh KrishnamurthyIowa State University, Ames, IA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foundation vision-language models (VLMs) excel on natural images, but their utility for biomedical microscopy remains underexplored. In this paper, we investigate how in-context learning enables state-of-the-art VLMs to perform few-shot object detection when large annotated datasets are unavailable, as is often the case with microscopic images. We introduce the Micro-OD benchmark, a curated collection of 252 images specifically curated for in-context learning, with bounding-box annotations spanning 11 cell types across four sources, including two in-lab expert-annotated sets. We systematically evaluate eight VLMs under few-shot conditions and compare variants with and without implicit test-time reasoning tokens. We further implement a hybrid Few-Shot Object Detection (FSOD) pipeline that combines a detection head with a VLM-based few-shot classifier, which enhances the few-shot performance of recent VLMs on our benchmark. Across datasets, we observe that zero-shot performance is weak due to the domain gap; however, few-shot support consistently improves detection, with marginal gains achieved after six shots. We observe that some reasoning variant models show task-specific gains, but the effect varies across models and settings. Our results highlight in-context adaptation as a promising research direction requiring further development for microscopy, and our benchmark provides a reproducible testbed for advancing open-vocabulary detection in biomedical imaging. Our project page is at: here.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiomedical imagingfew-shot learningmicroscopymultimodal sensingobject detectionreasoning

Identifiers

PMID42222844
PMCPMC13219282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.