SynthesisFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026
Transformer-based NLP approaches for credit risk prediction: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study systematically reviews transformer based Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Large Language Model (LLM) approaches for credit risk prediction, addressing limitations of traditional structured data credit scoring models. Methods: A PRISMA guided systematic literature review was conducted across Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science, covering English language studies published between 2015 and 2025. A total of 284 records were identified and screened using semantic similarity filtering, resulting in 63 eligible studies for qualitative synthesis. Results: The findings show that transformer based architectures, including Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT), Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach (RoBERTa), and Large Language Model Meta AI (LLaMA), consistently outperform traditional statistical and machine learning baselines across financial prediction tasks. Attention based Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) models reported Area Under the Curve (AUC) improvements of 3.08% and KS increases of 10.3% over classical methods, while hybrid Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) Transformer architectures achieved accuracy levels up to 96.9% and F1 scores of 0.995 in credit risk datasets. Multimodal and transformer based systems also reported accuracy levels exceeding 95% in financial risk monitoring tasks. However, only a limited subset of studies incorporates formal explainability frameworks or fairness evaluations. Discussion: Transformer based NLP approaches improve credit risk prediction by effectively leveraging unstructured textual data. Nevertheless, challenges remain in interpretability, transparency, regulatory alignment, and ethical deployment. Future research should prioritize bias mitigation and governance aware model design to support responsible use in regulated financial environments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.