ReviewACS omega2026
Machine Learning in Non-fullerene Organic Solar Cells: Accelerating Discovery, Design, and Understanding.
Review in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence of nonfullerene acceptors (NFAs) has transformed the performance of organic solar cells (OSCs), driving laboratory power conversion efficiencies beyond 19%. Yet the immense combinatorial space of possible donor-acceptor materials renders exhaustive experimental exploration impractical. Machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence have therefore become powerful tools for accelerating materials discovery, performance prediction, and molecular design in organic photovoltaics. This review provides a critical and systematic assessment of predictive and generative ML approaches applied to OSCs, encompassing methods ranging from random forests and gradient boosting to deep learning architectures such as graph neural networks, transformers, variational autoencoders, generative adversarial networks, and genetic algorithms. We examine advances in molecular representation and feature engineering, evaluate model performance in predicting key device metricsincluding power conversion efficiency, open-circuit voltage, short-circuit current density, and fill factorand assess the extent to which computational predictions translate into experimentally validated devices. We further discuss key limitations, including data set bias, distribution shift, morphology-related effects, chemical validity, and the synthetic accessibility of generated candidates, as well as the persistent gap between predicted and realized performance. Finally, we highlight emerging directions poised to shape the next phase of ML-guided OSC research, including physics-informed learning, multiobjective optimization, interpretable models, active learning coupled with first-principles calculations, and human-in-the-loop discovery pipelines. Collectively, these advances position machine learning as a central component in the rational design and accelerated development of next-generation organic photovoltaic materials.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.