ArticleACS omega2026
Investigating the Optical Properties of Gold Nanorods Using Forward and Inverse Design.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoparticles exhibit distinct optical properties due to their size, shape, and material composition, making them useful in photonics, sensing, and biological applications. Mie and Mie-Gans theory can be used to compute the optical properties of spherical and rod-shaped nanoparticles, which are limited by surface scattering and radiation damping; however, it cannot explain the optical properties of bipyramid, dumbbell, cube, and rectangular-shaped nanoparticles. Advanced computational techniques like Finite Difference Time Domain (FDTD) could be used to simulate the optical properties of complex-shaped nanoparticles, which is time-consuming and complex. To address this, we proposed to use a machine and deep learning-based forward and inverse design to explore the optical properties of gold nanorods. In forward design, we evaluated five different models and identified the XGB Regressor as the best performing model (MSE: 0.0041, MAE: 0.0190, R
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.