ArticleACS omega2026
Deciphering Molecular and Solvent Effects on Aqueous and Organic Solubility through Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solubility of a chemical compound is highly dependent on both its molecular structure and the experimental conditions at which the solubility is measured, which makes it a challenging task to accurately predict solubility across aqueous and organic media. In this study, an interpretable machine learning framework was developed for predicting the solubility of drug-like compounds using large-scale curated data sets, including AqSolDB, AqSolDBc, BigSolDB, and BigSolDB 2.0. CatBoost models were trained and rigorously validated using repeated 5-fold cross-validation, employing scaffold-based splitting for aqueous solubility and cold solute-solvent pair splitting for organic solubility. Feature selection and hyperparameter tuning were systematically applied, with hyperparameter optimization emerging as the primary contributor to performance improvement. The optimized models demonstrated strong and statistically significant performance improvement over baseline configurations. Similarity-based domain-of-applicability analysis on the external data set revealed that prediction error increases with structural dissimilarity from the training set. SHAP analysis provided mechanistic insights, showing that aqueous solubility is primarily governed by polarity and hydrogen-bonding descriptors, whereas organic solubility is influenced by solvent characteristics, temperature, and molecular topology. The consistency of results across data sets demonstrates the robustness and transferability of the learned structure-property relationships and the applicability of the proposed approach for real-world solubility prediction tasks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.