Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222781›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Pushing Complexometric Titrations in the Nanomolar Range through Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Monitoring.

Angélina Noclain, Gaëlle Charron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Angélina NoclainUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Matière et Systèmes Complexes, F-75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6838-159X
Gaëlle CharronUniversité Paris Cité, CNRS, Matière et Systèmes Complexes, F-75013 Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9501-6376

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complexometric titrations have been developed in the 1940s and 50s for virtually every metal cation. However, the colorimetry or spectrophotometric monitoring of their end points limit their sensitivity range to the μM to mM range. Hence, these methods were quickly replaced by atomic instrumental methods, which became the new benchmark when the corresponding instruments became widely accessible. However, in the context of a global lack of water quality data, especially in low-income or geographically isolated areas, these instrumental golden standards are out of reach. In this work, we revisit a popular complexometric titration of the heavy metal cation Cu

Identifiers

PMID42222781
PMCPMC13216945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.