Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222720›Full record

ArticlePrecision chemistry2026

Benchmarking Foundation Potentials against Quantum Chemistry Methods for Predicting Molecular Redox Potentials.

Yicheng Chen, Lixue Cheng, Yan Jing, Peichen Zhong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Precision chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yicheng ChenDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117575, Singapore.
Lixue ChengDepartment of Chemistry, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong 999077, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7329-0585
Yan JingDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117575, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5669-4609
Peichen ZhongDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117575, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1921-1628

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational high-throughput virtual screening is essential for identifying redox-active molecules for sustainable applications, such as electrochemical carbon capture. A primary challenge in this approach is the high computational cost associated with accurate quantum chemistry calculations. Machine learning foundation potentials (FPs) trained on extensive density functional theory (DFT) calculations offer a computationally efficient alternative. Here, we benchmark the MACE-OMol-0 and UMA FPs against a hierarchy of DFT functionals for predicting experimental molecular redox potentials for both electron transfer (ET) and proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reactions. We find that these FPs achieve exceptional accuracy for PCET processes, rivaling their target DFT method. However, the performance is diminished for ET reactions, particularly for multielectron transfers involving reactive ions that are underrepresented in the OMol25 training data, revealing a key out-of-distribution limitation. To overcome this, we propose an optimal hybrid workflow that uses the FPs for efficient geometry optimization and thermochemical analysis, followed by a crucial single-point DFT energy refinement and an implicit solvation correction. This pragmatic approach provides a robust and scalable strategy for accelerating high-throughput virtual screening in sustainable chemistry.

Indexed as

carbon capturehigh-throughput screeningmachine learning interatomic potentialproton-coupled electron transferredox potential

Identifiers

PMID42222720
PMCPMC13217336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.