ArticleSkin health and disease2026
A survey of UK-based dermatologists and Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy centres to evaluate the use of intravenous antibiotics as a treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa.
Article in Skin health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Case series have indicated that intravenous antibiotics may be effective in severe hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) treatment. This treatment approach is excluded from the British Association of Dermatologists UK HS treatment guidelines but can be found in the European S2k, North American and French Dermatology Society HS guidelines. Objectives: To study whether intravenous antibiotics are being used in HS treatment in the UK and to explore the experiences of dermatologists and outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) teams with intravenous antibiotics. Methods: Two separate surveys were distributed to dermatologists and OPAT centres respectively in 2020. The surveys were designed on Survey Monkey Results: Seventy-four dermatology clinicians and 25 OPAT centres responded. Nearly half of the respondents reported having treated HS with intravenous antibiotics. Most used intravenous ertapenem for an average treatment duration of 4-6 weeks with 1-3 months of average remission period. Top indications were severe disease (57%) and biologic treatment failure (57%). The most common consolidation treatments were biologics, surgery and tetracycline antibiotics. A joint dermatology-OPAT HS clinic was preferred. Dermatologists reported exclusion of intravenous antibiotics from local/national guidelines (67%) being the main barrier to using intravenous antibiotics. Conclusion: Findings from the two surveys show overall positive experience using intravenous antibiotics in HS treatment and call for development of a best practice statement in HS treatment with intravenous antibiotics and collaborative working with OPAT for a national referral pathway.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.