Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222690›Full record

ReviewSkin health and disease2026

Clinical implications of skincare: lessons from placebo-controlled dermatology trials.

Chawalpat Siripanich, Yan Ching Chow, Faisal R Ali

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Skin health and disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Chawalpat SiripanichSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7848-8669
Yan Ching ChowSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4891-8231
Faisal R AliSchool of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8588-791X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the past decade, nonprescription skincare has gained significant attention. However, evidence supporting many skincare trends often lacks the rigorous testing seen in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for prescribed medications. Vehicle arms in RCTs, which test nonmedicated treatments, provide insights that support the advocacy of basic skincare practices. This narrative literature review explores the lessons drawn from vehicle arms of RCTs in the management of conditions like acne vulgaris, actinic keratoses, melasma, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation and rosacea. A literature search was performed on MEDLINE and Embase to identify RCTs involving vehicle arms for the dermatological conditions. Data on outcomes, study design and sample size were extracted and analysed. Basic skincare practices such as cleansing, moisturizing and sun protection have consistently demonstrated meaningful improvements in dermatological outcomes, even without active treatments. Vehicle arms often achieve a substantial proportion of the efficacy seen in active treatments, frequently exceeding half of the efficacy seen in active treatments, emphasizing the potential of simple skincare regimens. For acne vulgaris, two identical international phase III RCTs (involving 2817 participants) demonstrated up to 25.7% improvement in facial acne severity and 51.2% reduction in inflammatory lesions with vehicle treatment. In actinic keratoses, an RCT (

Identifiers

PMID42222690
PMCPMC13220015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.