ReviewRevista Cuidarte
Etiological risk factors for infection in the postoperative period of cardiovascular surgery, integrative review.
Review in Revista Cuidarte. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recognizing the elements related to the risk for infection during the postoperative period of cardiovascular surgery is essential for guiding effective strategies and strengthening clinical judgment. Objective: To identify the etiological factors associated with the nursing diagnosis "risk for infection" during the postoperative period of cardiovascular surgery in the intensive care unit from the scientific literature. Materials and Methods: An integrative literature review based on the methodology of Whittemore and Knafl. The search was conducted between August and September 2024 in the Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, and CINAHL databases. The controlled descriptors used were Risk Factors, Risk, Infection, Nursing Diagnosis, Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures, and Intensive Care Units. The uncontrolled terms used were Risk of Infection, Cardiac Surgery, and Cardiovascular Surgery in English, Spanish, and Portuguese. After quality assessment, 25 articles met the criteria for data extraction. Results: 36 etiological factors associated with the diagnosis "risk for infection" in the postoperative period of cardiovascular surgery were identified; of these, 14 were already described in NANDA-I, and 22 new factors are not included in this taxonomy. Discussion: The elements related to the reviewed diagnosis are grouped into three categories: patient antecedent factors, perioperative factors, and factors associated with the postoperative period in the ICU. Conclusion: The identification of new etiological factors associated with the diagnosis "risk for infection," specific to the target population, contributes to an understanding of the causality of this diagnosis and to determining nursing interventions based on the etiological factors identified during diagnostic reasoning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.