Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222642›Full record

ReviewJournal of pain research2026

Interpectoral and Pectoserratus Plane Blocks Compared with Serratus Anterior Plane Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Breast Surgery (Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Reconstruction): A Narrative Review.

Madison C Wolf, Francis Clay Thompson, Mills Manthei, Viraj Shetty, William Brandt, Sridhar Tirumala, Sahar Shekoohi, Shahab Ahmadzadeh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of pain research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madison C WolfSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-1720-6557
Francis Clay ThompsonSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Mills MantheiSchool of Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Viraj ShettyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
William BrandtDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Sridhar TirumalaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.
Sahar ShekoohiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-4545-4523
Shahab AhmadzadehDepartment of Anesthesiology, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center at Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, 71103, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative pain remains a major concern following breast surgery, with persistent pain rates varying by definition and duration of follow-up. Optimizing perioperative analgesia is essential to enhance recovery and reduce the risk of chronic postmastectomy pain syndrome (PMPS). Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, including interpectoral plane (IPP), pectoserratus plane (PSP), and serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks, have gained increasing use as regional analgesic techniques targeting chest wall innervation while avoiding the risks associated with more invasive regional approaches such as thoracic epidural or paravertebral blocks. A narrative review of the literature was conducted using PubMed, with studies selected based on relevance to postoperative pain outcomes in breast surgery. Evidence suggests that IPP, PSP, and SAP blocks are associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and opioid consumption compared with systemic analgesia alone. Comparative studies generally demonstrate similar overall analgesic efficacy between techniques, although differences in dermatomal coverage and onset characteristics have been reported. IPP primarily targets the pectoral nerves, whereas PSP provides broader coverage of the intercostal and intercostobrachial nerves, including the axillary region. In contrast, SAP blocks provide wider lateral thoracic wall coverage through blockade of the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves. Evidence regarding effects on chronic pain outcomes remains limited and heterogeneous. These techniques demonstrate favorable safety profiles when performed under ultrasound guidance. Selection of block technique should be individualized based on surgical approach, anticipated pain distribution, and patient-specific factors.

Indexed as

breast surgery analgesiachronic postmastectomy paininterpectoral plane blockpectoserratus plane blockpostoperative pain managementregional anesthesiaserratus anterior plane blockultrasound-guided nerve block

Identifiers

PMID42222642
PMCPMC13221997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.