ReviewCureus2026
A Bibliometric Analysis of Accelerated Orthodontics Research in the Middle East Across Three Major Databases.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accelerated orthodontics seeks to reduce the prolonged duration of conventional orthodontic treatment and the associated pain and discomfort, particularly among adult patients. A growing body of invasive, minimally invasive, and noninvasive techniques, ranging from corticotomy and periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics to piezocision, micro-osteoperforations, and low-level laser therapy (LLLT), has stimulated regional research activity and prompted the need to map scholarly output and trends across the Middle East. The objective of this work was to perform a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of accelerated orthodontics publications originating from Middle Eastern countries (2008-2025), identifying publication trends, leading authors and institutions, dominant research themes, citation impact, and patterns of regional collaboration to inform future clinical research priorities. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted in September 2025 using a predefined strategy. The PICOS criteria included adult patients (≥18 years) receiving fixed or removable orthodontic treatment with adjunctive acceleration methods; comparators were conventional treatment without acceleration; outcomes were treatment duration or rate of tooth movement; and eligible study designs were randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews published in English between 2005 and 2025. Search results from the three databases were exported to EndNote and analyzed with the VOSviewer software (version 1.6.20) to generate co-authorship, co-citation, and keyword networks. Two independent reviewers screened titles/abstracts and full texts, with a third reviewer resolving discrepancies. Extracted bibliometric indicators included publication counts, citation totals, author and institutional affiliations, article types, and keyword clusters. Following the predefined search strategy, a total of 973 articles were initially identified and screened for relevance. After this screening process, 65 publications were included in the final analysis. The final corpus comprised 48 randomized controlled trials (76%), 16 systematic reviews (23%), and one cohort study (1%). Annual output and citations rose markedly from 2013 onward, with an exponential surge between 2021 and 2024 and a peak in 2022 (19 articles; 320 citations). A total of 120 authors contributed; the most prolific authors were Hajeer MY, Burhan AS, and Ajaj MA, with 14 of the top 15 authors affiliated with Syria. Damascus University produced 52 publications, and Syria led citation impact (1,772 citations), followed by Turkey and Saudi Arabia. Keyword analysis revealed four thematic clusters: pain and discomfort, acceleration methods (surgical, minimally invasive, and noninvasive), target populations, and gender. The most cited works focused on surgical approaches and LLLT. Accelerated orthodontics research from the Middle East has grown substantially, driven predominantly by Syrian institutions, especially Damascus University, and concentrated author networks. Surgical techniques and LLLT dominate high-impact publications, while minimally invasive and noninvasive modalities are increasingly investigated and appear more acceptable to certain patient groups. Broader multicenter and international trials, standardized outcome measures, and patient-centered evaluations are recommended to translate regional advances into generalizable clinical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.