Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222605›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroimaging2026

Pulvinar pathways as skip connections in deep neural networks for vision.

Narmin Zarinabadi, Christian Casanova, Nelson Cortes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroimaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Narmin ZarinabadiVisual Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Optometry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Christian CasanovaVisual Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Optometry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nelson CortesVisual Neuroscience Laboratory, School of Optometry, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The pulvinar is thought to regulate cortico-cortical communication through transthalamic pathways, yet the computational consequences of such modulation remain unclear. Methods: A minimal pulvinar-inspired long-range skip pathway in a hierarchical convolutional vision model was tested, implemented as a learned projection from early to late feature maps coupled with a gain-controlled gating mechanism. The architecture was evaluated in two complementary experiments: CIFAR-10 categorization and a near-threshold contrast-detection task with noisy backgrounds. Results: In CIFAR-10 categorization, the pulvinar-augmented model did not primarily act as a uniform accuracy booster; instead, it reshaped contrast-dependent response scaling and stabilized internal representations, consistent with gain control. These effects persisted under matched representational regimes, indicating that performance differences cannot be explained by changes in representational geometry alone. In the near-threshold detection task, pulvinar-like modulation systematically redistributed detection outcomes, consistent with shifts in decision criterion under uncertainty, and in specific regimes supported improved discriminability. Discussion: Together, these findings indicate that pulvinar-inspired connectivity contributes primarily to gain and decision-criterion control. We propose that the pulvinar regulates how sensory evidence is weighted and converted into decisions, rather than directly enhancing task accuracy.

Indexed as

contrast-dependent gain controldecision weightingignition threshold regulationnear-threshold decision criterionPulvinarrepresentation stabilizationskip-connectionstransthalamic connections

Identifiers

PMID42222605
PMCPMC13215803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.