Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222551›Full record

ArticleBasic and clinical neuroscience

The Effect of Frontal-plane Balance Training on Fall Prevention in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mitra Parsa, Iraj Abdollahi, Hossein Negahban, Mohammad Ali Sanjari, Enayatollah Bakhshi, Haniyeh Fakur Haddadiyan, Mina Rouhani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Basic and clinical neuroscience. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mitra ParsaNeuromusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-1365-2385
Iraj AbdollahiNeuromusculoskeletal Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0009-0005-6600-8288
Hossein NegahbanDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-8387-1781
Mohammad Ali SanjariBiomechanics Lab, Department of Basic Rehabilitation Sciences, Rehabilitation Research Center, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0003-3425-7448
Enayatollah BakhshiDepartment of Biostatistics, Faculty of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-6566-9723
Haniyeh Fakur HaddadiyanDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0009-0000-3499-4750
Mina RouhaniDepartment of Physiotherapy, School of Paramedical and Rehabilitation Sciences, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID 0009-0008-1711-0798

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study investigated the impact of frontal plane-focused balance training (FPBT) on fall prevention in stroke survivors. Methods: A total of 59 chronic stroke survivors (mean age: 52.24±16.35 y, 18 female) were divided into the FPBT and control groups; both underwent an 8-week training program with three 1-hour sessions per week, incorporating single- and dual-task balance exercises. Primary outcomes included fall numbers and faller odds, while secondary outcomes assessed balance function using the Berg balance scale (BBS), mini-balance evaluation systems test (Mini-BEST), activities-specific balance confidence scale (ABC), and fall risk for older people in the community (FROP-Com). Results: No statistically significant differences were found in fall numbers or faller odds between the groups during the training (P=0.768 and P=0.065) or follow-up period (P=0.461 and P=0.298), using negative binomial and logistic regression, respectively. A decline in fall risk was observed in the FPBT group compared with the control group. Both groups showed significant improvements in secondary outcomes (BBS, P=0.013; Mini-BEST, P<0.001; ABC, P<0.001; and FROP-Com, P<0.001), with no significant between-group differences (BBS, P=0.395; Mini-BEST, P=0.295; ABC, P=0.186; and FROP-Com, P=0.886). Conclusion: The findings suggest that while FPBT did not significantly outperform conventional balance training in reducing falls, a trend toward fall risk reduction was observed. Further research is needed to optimize FPBT's effectiveness for stroke survivors. Highlights: FPBT showed consistent, though non-significant, reductions in fall numbers and faller odds compared to control across all periods, suggesting its potential as a promising intervention.All participants improved significantly in balance, mobility confidence, and fall risk measures after the intervention.No additional benefit of FPBT over control was found for any clinical outcome measure.Time effect dominated group effect, suggesting general benefits of any balance training. Plain Language Summary: This study tested whether a special type of balance training-focused on side-to-side (lateral) movements-could help prevent falls in people who have had a stroke. Falls are a major concern for stroke survivors, often leading to injuries and reduced independence. The researchers compared this new training, called frontal-plane balance training (FPBT), with traditional balance exercises to see which worked better. Fifty-nine stroke survivors were split into two groups: one did FPBT (practicing sideways balance exercises), while the other did standard balance training. Both groups exercised the practice three times a week for 8 weeks. The researchers tracked falls before, during, and 6 months after the training. They also measured balance, balance confidence, and fall risk using clinical tests. Both groups improved in balance and confidence, but FPBT did not differ significantly from traditional training. PBT showed a trend toward reducing falls: participants had fewer falls during and after training compared to the control group, but the difference was not large enough to be certain. No major differences were seen in balance test scores between the two groups, suggesting both methods helped similarly. Falls after a stroke can be life-changing, causing fractures or loss of independence. While FPBT did not outperform standard training, the trend suggests it might still be helpful. The study also confirms that any balance training can improve stability and balance confidence for stroke survivors. Future research could examine whether longer or more intensive FPBT programs make a greater difference.

Indexed as

BalanceFallFrontal plane focused balance training (FPBT)Stroke

Identifiers

PMID42222551
PMCPMC13220674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.