ArticleFree neuropathology2026
Brain extraction for fixed tissue banking: a technical report.
Article in Free neuropathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A canine brain bank for comparative neuroscience and brain aging research.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain banking enables the study of human neural tissue and is essential for research on disease, physiology, and neuroanatomy. An essential step for whole brain studies is the extraction of the brain from the skull. Yet detailed technical descriptions of brain removal are rare, perhaps contributing to the artifactual tissue disruption sometimes observed as a result of the procedure. Here, we describe a method for whole brain extraction that could be implemented in the context of a whole-body donation, focused on the use case of fixed tissue banking. The method involves a sequential craniectomy that uses both circumferential and midline sagittal cuts, followed by a posterior approach to cutting the dura. We report the application of this protocol across n = 105 human whole-body donors. We document the time required for each procedural step and the frequency of craniectomy artifacts and skull edge artifacts at the brain surface. When the brain tissue is particularly soft, we also describe the potential use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.