ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2025
Timescales of dopamine release in the striatum as a window into hierarchical control.
Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dual cholinergic mechanisms for sculpting striatal dopamine in vivo.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The reinforcement learning community has made significant progress in understanding dopamine (DA) in reward learning, cognitive control, and motivation. Yet, little consensus remains about the functions of distinct DA bandwidths-fast phasic transients (milliseconds), ramps (seconds), and slow tonic shifts (minutes). Are these dynamics independent channels conveying distinct decision variables or temporal expressions of a unified DA computation? These questions lie at the heart of competing frameworks proposing divergent mechanisms for DA in reinforcement learning. This rift reflects not only conceptual disagreements but also the historical limitations of bandwidth-limited measurement tools. Emerging breakthroughs for wideband DA quantification now enable rigorous testing of these theories. Here, we synthesize recent conceptual and technical advances and extend our prior proposals, suggesting that DA timescales reflect hierarchical control signals-emerging from goal progress and distributed, circuit-level inference about policy efficacy-where tonic DA represents the integration of goal alignment abstracted across planning horizons and control hierarchy.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.