Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42222427›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026

A head-to-head comparison of MRI and CT using Node-RADS for rectal cancer lymph nodes: Observer agreement and diagnostic performance.

Yi Cai, Yimin Wang, Ying Tang, Ru Yang, Fubi Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yi CaiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yimin WangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ying TangDepartment of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ru YangDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Fubi HuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the assessment agreement and diagnostic performance of CT and MRI using the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for preoperative regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) in rectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included 97 rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. A total of 148 lymph nodes (LNs) were evaluated. Postoperative histopathology served as the reference standard. CT-based and MRI-based Node-RADS scores, as well as the ESGAR category, were assessed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Inter- and intra-observer agreement for Node-RADS was evaluated using weighted kappa statistics. A subgroup analysis was further conducted on 27 image-pathology matched LNs. Results: Node-RADS scores showed a strong positive correlation with pathological N stage (MRI: Conclusion: Node-RADS provides a standardized tool for preoperative regional lymph node assessment in rectal cancer, showing better diagnostic performance than ESGAR criteria. MRI demonstrates higher diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement than CT, supporting MRI as the preferred modality.

Indexed as

Computed tomographyESGAR categoryLymph nodeMagnetic resonance imagingNode-RADSRectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID42222427
PMCPMC13218117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.