ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026
A head-to-head comparison of MRI and CT using Node-RADS for rectal cancer lymph nodes: Observer agreement and diagnostic performance.
Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the assessment agreement and diagnostic performance of CT and MRI using the Node Reporting and Data System (Node-RADS) for preoperative regional lymph node metastasis (LNM) in rectal cancer. Methods: This retrospective study included 97 rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent preoperative contrast-enhanced CT and MRI. A total of 148 lymph nodes (LNs) were evaluated. Postoperative histopathology served as the reference standard. CT-based and MRI-based Node-RADS scores, as well as the ESGAR category, were assessed. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. Inter- and intra-observer agreement for Node-RADS was evaluated using weighted kappa statistics. A subgroup analysis was further conducted on 27 image-pathology matched LNs. Results: Node-RADS scores showed a strong positive correlation with pathological N stage (MRI: Conclusion: Node-RADS provides a standardized tool for preoperative regional lymph node assessment in rectal cancer, showing better diagnostic performance than ESGAR criteria. MRI demonstrates higher diagnostic performance and inter-observer agreement than CT, supporting MRI as the preferred modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.