ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Phase I/II, open-label, multicenter study of durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab in pediatric patients with advanced solid tumors.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03837899 (Phase I/II, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of Durvalumab Monotherapy or in Combination With Tremelimumab in Pediatric Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Hematological Malignancies.), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase I/II, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Preliminary Efficacy of Durvalumab Monotherapy or in Combination With Tremelimumab in Pediatric Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors and Hematological Malignancies.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: We conducted a phase I/II study to evaluate durvalumab (D; anti-PD-L1) in combination with tremelimumab (T; anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4) in pediatric patients with relapsed/refractory solid tumors. Patients and methods: The dose-finding phase (phase I) assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics of D+T at two dose levels to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The primary endpoint for the dose-expansion phase (phase II) was antitumor activity (by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1) at the RP2D. Assessment of circulating cells reflecting immune cell activation was a secondary endpoint. Results: Based on safety and pharmacokinetic data in the dose-finding phase (n = 29), the adult-equivalent RP2D was determined as D (30 mg/kg) + T (1 mg/kg). In the dose-expansion phase, 21 patients (sarcoma, n = 11; solid tumors, n = 10) were treated at the RP2D. Of patients with sarcoma, none achieved an objective response and one had stable disease ≥7 weeks. Of the patients with solid tumors, one (chordoma) had a confirmed partial response (10.8 months duration) and one (renal cell carcinoma) had stable disease ≥7 weeks. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 76% of patients (19% as grade 3 or 4). No adverse events leading to death were reported. Across both phases treatment with D+T resulted in an increase in CD4+Ki67+ T cells. Conclusions: D (30 mg/kg) + T (1 mg/kg) had limited antitumor activity in this pediatric population; however, the safety profile was manageable and consistent with the known safety profile in adult patients, with no new safety concerns identified. Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT03837899; EudraCT, identifier 2018-003118-42.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.