ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026
Advanced therapy treatment patterns in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: a long-term retrospective claims analysis.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There has been significant evolution in advanced therapy (AT) options for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed shifts in treatment patterns over time using a large claims database with long-term follow-up. Methods: This retrospective study utilized the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus claims database (2012-2023) to analyze adults in the United States with UC who initiated an AT. Patients had ≥3 years of continuous follow-up after AT initiation and no evidence of other autoimmune diseases during the six-month baseline period. Treatment patterns including persistence, switching, and/or discontinuation were summarized. Analyses were stratified by year of AT initiation: 2012-2014, 2015-2016, 2017-2018, and 2019-2020. Results: 6726 patients with a mean follow-up of 61.5 months and treatment duration of 22.9 months (SD: 14.2) were included. Vedolizumab usage increased over time in parallel with a reduction in anti-TNF therapy. Around 27%-34% of patients had dose escalation and 40% switched ATs at some point during follow-up. AT treatment persistence rates at 3 years of follow-up were <40% across all time periods, and <10% when limiting to patients who did not require dose escalation and/or steroids. Approximately 57% of patients in routine practice discontinued AT and did not start a subsequent AT. Conclusion: Despite the availability of multiple new AT options for UC, rates of steroid-free persistence without the need for dose escalation were low. High rates of treatment discontinuation across lines of therapy highlight a need for durable treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.