ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026
A real-world observational study of second-line anti-TNFα treatment in patients with ulcerative colitis who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Many patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) require treatment with more than one biologic during their lifetime. This real-world observational study assessed the effectiveness of second-line anti-tumor necrosis factor α (anti-TNFα) treatment in patients with UC who had previously received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. Methods: This retrospective study included biologic-naive adult patients with UC who were treated with vedolizumab as a first-line biologic at a large, multicenter, private gastroenterology practice in Texas, United States, between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. Outcomes were assessed by partial Mayo score, not including endoscopic data. Results: In total, 260 patients received vedolizumab. Treatment was discontinued in 53 patients who then received a second-line anti-TNFα treatment. Of all patients treated with a second-line anti-TNFα treatment, 14/53 (26.4%) had a clinical response and 11/53 (20.8%) had clinical remission at 12 months. Accounting for anti-TNFα treatment discontinuations, 14/26 patients (53.8%) had a clinical response, and 11/26 patients (42.3%) had clinical remission at 12 months, respectively. In an exploratory analysis of the patients who received vedolizumab as a first-line biologic, 188/260 (72.3%) remained on treatment at 12 months and 149/188 (79.3%) of them had clinical remission. For those with a partial Mayo score ≥ 5 at baseline, onset of vedolizumab action was observed in 49.6% by week 2 and in 87.2% by week 6. Conclusions: Second-line anti-TNFα treatments were effective following vedolizumab as a first-line biologic. Most patients had onset of action of vedolizumab within 6 weeks and had clinical remission at 12 months.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.