ArticleSAGE open nursing
A Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation Study of the Good Nursing Care Scale for Nurses Among Indonesian Nurses.
Article in SAGE open nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The Good Nursing Care Scale for Nurses (GNCS-N) measures nurses' perceptions of nursing care quality, but no validated Indonesian version has been available. Objectives: This study aimed to translate, adapt, and evaluate the construct validity and reliability of the Indonesian version of the GNCS-N (I-GNCSN). Method: Following COSMIN-informed procedures, the GNCS-N underwent forward-back translation, expert review, and pilot testing. A cross-sectional study using convenience sampling was conducted among inpatient nurses, and 255 complete responses were retained for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). A second-order CFA was performed in LISREL 8.72 because the GNCS-N has an established theory-based multidimensional structure. Model fit was evaluated using chi-square, RMSEA, SRMR, CFI, NNFI, NFI, GFI, and AGFI. Convergent validity was assessed using average variance extracted (AVE), and internal consistency was assessed using composite reliability and Cronbach's alpha. Result: The final I-GNCSN retained the original seven dimensions and 40 items. The re-estimated second-order CFA showed acceptable-to-good fit: chi-square = 1529.99, df = 708, RMSEA = 0.068 (90% CI 0.063-0.072), SRMR = 0.059, CFI = 0.98, NNFI = 0.98, and NFI = 0.96. GFI (0.77) and AGFI (0.73) remained below ideal thresholds and are therefore interpreted cautiously. Most standardized factor loadings were moderate to high, although one item showed comparatively weak performance and should be re-examined in future studies. Internal consistency remained acceptable, whereas convergent validity was weaker for constructs with AVE values below 0.50. Conclusion: The I-GNCSN demonstrates acceptable structural validity and good internal consistency for use among Indonesian inpatient nurses. However, some fit indices remained suboptimal and convergent validity was mixed for several constructs; therefore, findings should be interpreted cautiously. Further studies should examine temporal stability, test the instrument in broader clinical settings, and re-evaluate weaker items.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.