ArticleUltrasound (Leeds, England)2026
Sonographers' perspectives towards the increase in medico-legal litigation: An exploratory qualitative study.
Article in Ultrasound (Leeds, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Medico-legal litigation is increasing within sonography, a profession already affected by high levels of occupational burnout and ongoing recruitment and retention challenges. Despite this trend, little research has explored how the possibility of litigation affects sonographers' well-being or influences their professional practice. Method: This qualitative descriptive study was conducted in the United Kingdom. Purposive voluntary sampling recruited six National Health Service sonographers via social media. Online semi-structured interviews explored their perspectives on rising medico-legal litigation. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Results: Four themes were identified: (1) The emotional and psychological burden, (2) The impact on sonography practices, (3) Work-related pressures, and (4) Supporting the sonographer. Litigation fear affected well-being and contributed to defensive behaviours, particularly in report writing. Participants also described systemic pressures, such as workload demands, limited appointment times, and misunderstandings about the sonographer's role that increased the perceived risk of error and potential litigation. While transparency and professional accountability was valued, many highlighted the need for clearer guidance, learning opportunities, and stronger organisational support. Conclusion: Sonographers reported fear and uncertainty surrounding medico-legal litigation, alongside pressures that shaped both practice and emotional well-being. Although these concerns were prominent, participants also recognised the importance of transparency and accountability when supported by fair processes. Enhancing guidance, training, and organisational support may help reduce litigation fear and contribute to a more sustainable sonography workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.