ReviewSurgery open science2026
Civil medical liability in general surgery: A systematic review.
Review in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Civil medical liability is an important issue in modern surgical practice, affecting both medical practice and the doctor-patient relationship, and contributing to the increasing use of defensive medicine. General surgery, as a predominantly invasive specialty with a wide range of emergency and elective procedures, is at increased risk of legal claims. The purpose of this systematic review was to investigate the international literature on the civil medical liability of general surgeons, with an emphasis on the types of procedures involved, the causes of lawsuits, and the reported compensation amounts. A systematic search of PubMed and Scopus was performed according to PRISMA guidelines, without geographical restrictions, and included only English-language studies. After removing duplicates and evaluating the titles, abstracts, and full texts, 41 studies were included in the final analysis. Legal claims in general surgery typically involve common procedures such as cholecystectomy, hernia repair, thyroidectomy, and bariatric surgery. Compensation varies widely by country, with the highest amounts linked to permanent injury or death. The main causes include surgical errors, delayed diagnosis or treatment, missed postoperative complications, and poor patient consent documentation. The findings suggest that medical liability in general surgery is a multifactorial issue, in which the management of complications and patient communication play roles as important as surgical technique. A systematic understanding of the factors leading to legal claims may contribute to improving patient safety, reducing defensive medicine, and enhancing the quality of surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.