ArticleChemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society2026
Quasi-In-Situ Analysis of Electrode Top Atomic Layers via High-Sensitivity Low-Energy Ion Scattering and Potential-Controlled Sample Transfer.
Article in Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrocatalytic reactions involve interfacial interactions between the surfaces of electrodes and reactive species at an electrolyte interface. There are presently no universal or unambiguous methods to directly assay the active top atomic layer composition that influences the reactivity of these electrodes under relevant operating conditions. Low-energy ion scattering (LEIS) spectroscopy is a surface characterization technique that yields compositional analysis of the outermost atomic layer of a material, but it must be performed in ultrahigh vacuum (UHV). Application of LEIS measurements to electrochemical materials that are removed from ambient liquid-phase environments thus leaves an open question as to whether the surface that is transferred to UHV is truly the surface that manifested during the electrochemical reaction. Toward the goal of preserving the active surface state, we developed a sample transfer workflow for LEIS enabling air-free removal and drying of an electrode from an electrochemical cell while maintaining control of the potential using an auxiliary electrode. The potential-controlled emersion method was demonstrated to give distinct potential-dependent surface compositions for a Cu-Pd alloy relative to removal after uncontrolled return to open-circuit potential. A Cu-enriched surface was found at anodic potential and a Pd-enriched surface at cathodic potential, suggesting that the approach can be used to retain representative atomic configurations during transfer. Since adsorbates will often persist from the reaction environment, conventional sample pretreatment methods for removal, including atomic O and atomic H exposure, were also contrasted. Both methods were found to differ with results from incidental low-dose depth profiling by the LEIS primary ion source, which removes adventitious species and surface atoms during the course of repeated measurements. These depth profiles were found to be sensitive to sample history and thus qualitatively informative, despite the possible changes induced by ion damage. The results exhibit (i) the need for complete control over the polarization state of the sample at all times (no excursions to open circuit during transfer) and (ii) the utility of low-dose depth profiling to capture changes in the near-surface composition.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.