ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Relationship between idiopathic scoliosis and body composition -a case-control study.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study investigated the association between idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and body composition in Polish children and adolescents compared to healthy peers, using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). IS is a spinal deformity seen in youth, often linked with a thinner build (lower BMI and body weight), but body composition details are poorly documented in Europeans. The study aimed to compare fat, muscle, and other body components between IS patients and controls, and to examine links with scoliosis severity (Cobb angle). Methods: Cross-sectional design, with 92 IS participants and 94 age- and gender-matched controls. Measurements included BMI, fat and muscle mass, bone mass, metabolic rate, and more via BIA. Results: The IS group had lower BMI and muscle mass than controls. Despite lower muscle mass, IS subjects had higher body fat percentage, absolute fat mass, and waist-to-height ratio (central fat). Bone mass and metabolic rate showed no significant difference between groups. Greater spinal curvature is linked with lower BMI, muscle mass, and metabolic activity. Implications. IS is associated with a specific body composition: less muscle, higher central fat, and lower BMI. Conclusion: Consequently, routine body composition assessment in IS management is recommended. Study limitations include its cross-sectional design, which prevents causal inference, a relatively small sample, and unaccounted factors like physical activity. Longitudinal research is needed to clarify these relationships and explore therapeutic body composition modifications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.