ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Intestinal perforation secondary to ingested chicken bone: case report and literature review.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Foreign body ingestion is usual in daily life, particularly prevalent in the pediatric population and the elderly, but it can also occur in adults due to eating quickly or inadequate mastication. Most foreign bodies can pass through the gastrointestinal tract spontaneously without intervention. However, hard and sharp foreign bodies may penetrate through gastric and duodenal walls. Small bowel perforation caused by chicken bones is rare in clinical practice. It presents no specific symptoms and causing diagnosis delayed. Endoscopy is limited for foreign bodies in the lower gastrointestinal tract, while abdominal computed tomography (CT) plays a key role in detecting radiopaque foreign bodies and related complications. In terms of treatment, laparoscopic surgery has become an optimal choice for foreign body extraction given its advantages of minimal trauma, clear visualization, and rapid postoperative recovery. Here, we report the diagnosis and management of a 28-year-old male with a acute small bowel perforation caused by an ingested chicken bone fragment. The patient initially presented with oropharyngeal discomfort during chicken consumption, but initial laryngoscopic evaluation revealed no abnormalities. Within hours, he developed progressive, non-resolving abdominal pain, prompting further investigation with abdominal computed tomography (CT), which identified a hyperdense linear object within the distal ileum, consistent with foreign body perforation. The patient underwent successful laparoscopic extraction of the chicken bone fragment with primary repair of the perforation site, experiencing an uneventful recovery and discharge on postoperative day 7.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.